Town heads back to court on Franklin Phonetic School parking citation
Wants judge to review language in town code
Updated as of Wednesday, January 16, 2019 5:57 PM
Although a judge dismissed the Town of Prescott Valley’s most recent Request for Rehearing, Town Attorney Ivan Legler said he currently is in the process of preparing a new petition in hopes the Court of Appeals will see things differently.
This most recent round of motions stems from a Nov. 29 Motion for Rehearing filed by the town against Franklin Phonetic Primary School, claiming the previous court erred by incorrectly interpreting town code.
The following day, Nov. 30, Cynthia Franklin, the school’s founder and current supervisor, filed a motion for attorney’s fees.
On Dec. 21, Yavapai County Superior Court Judge Don Stevens denied the town’s request for a rehearing, and awarded the school’s request for attorney’s fees and costs amounting to $9,603.42.
On Nov. 13, Judge Stevens had upheld a May 2016 ruling by Hearing Officer Peter Van Haren dismissing the town’s initial citation against the school for not having enough parking spaces.
The town wants the judge to reconsider an “error” in interpreting Town Code 13-24-030(F), which states, “Other off-site parking in the Town right-of-way may be included for required parking if such parking and the use is part of an approved Improvement District or otherwise approved by a development agreement with the Town.”
The town had asked the Court of Appeals to review Superior Court Judge Joseph Goldstein’s March 2017 decision upholding the original hearing officer’s decision, which the town called “arbitrary and capricious.” The appellate court vacated the order and sent the case back to Superior Court, which denied a rehearing in August 2017. The Court of Appeals also denied the town’s request for rehearing the town filed in February 2018.
The town established the Parkway Community Improvement District (CFD) in 2006 that extends in front of the Franklin Phonetic School on the north side of Highway 69, and also included properties along the south side of the highway. Prescott Valley’s Town Code states that nonprofits are exempt from paying property taxes or payments into an improvement district. Multiple judges have upheld the town code with regard to Franklin School.
TOWN WANTS ‘FAIRNESS’
Town Manager Larry Tarkowski has long held that the town only wants Franklin Phonetic School to pay for the benefit it receives – the parking spaces the town put in as part of the improvement district.
“That’s only fair,” he said, adding that the town will continue its pursuit of payment from Franklin.
“When the town has been able to secure fairness for the members of the CFD, then we will be done,” he said. “We have an obligation to the other people in the district that are paying the bill that they shouldn’t have to pay for somebody else’s landscaping and parking improvements.”
All the other charter and public schools in town pay for their own parking lots, he added, although none are located within an improvement district.
DISTRICT MEMBERS SPEAK OUT
Other property owners within the CFD feel strongly that Franklin should pay up.
Denny Hammond owns property along 1st Street. He is adamant that Franklin should pay because he says Cindy Franklin agreed at the very beginning to pay her share, then reneged. He acknowledged that property owners were presented with a payment that more than doubled when the assessments first came due, and tripled in subsequent years.
“This is not a tax; this was an improvement. That is a non-disputable fact,” Hammond said, adding that he has followed the ongoing legal issues, which he calls “an absolute nightmare for the town as well as the property owners.”
Another property owner along 1st Street, John Passamoni, feels similarly about paying one’s fair share, especially when he feels property owners got “boondoggled” by Richard Parker, Community Development director.
The whole project was based on two promises, Passamoni said, access to Highway 69 and that property owners would be able to add onto their existing buildings. The cost was to be $5,000 per year for 25 years. He currently pays $10,000 to $11,000 a year, or about $1,000 per month, for the improvements that consist of an empty parking lot that is useless to him.
“There is no value to me at all,” Passamoni said. “What really chapped me was the misrepresentation by Richard Parker and the fact that nonprofits didn’t pay it.”
He wanted to sue the town and Parker, and remains unhappy with the town and with non-paying nonprofits.
Two nonprofits do pay into the district, Living Waters Church on 2nd Street and Stepping Stones, which owns the property where the Red Barn is located. Robin Burke, executive director of Stepping Stones, said her board agreed to pay the assessment because “paying our share is the right thing to do.”
The organization bought the property after the town created the CFD, and together they worked out a payment plan of about $8,000 per year. She said nonprofits, churches and schools do not pay taxes, but this assessment pays for improvements and should not be considered a tax.
“We understand this is a burden on other companies if we don’t do our share,” Burke said.
Tarkowski denies that Franklin offered to pay a one-time settlement of $50,000 to the town, as previously stated by Franklin. He conceded said they have “talked from time to time about payments.”
Franklin said Jan. 15, the offer was made years ago and Tarkowski said it was too little. The school has not offered to pay anything since the town started its legal actions.
The stalemate could end soon, he said.
The town and Franklin are in negotiations to craft an “all-encompassing” agreement that would include parking spaces, improvement district assessments and property easements having to do with the existing water main owned by the town on Franklin’s newer piece of property west of the school.
“We want to see Franklin succeed and expand,” Tarkowski said.
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS 101
Property owners within improvement districts are assessed a portion of the total cost of the improvements based on the square footage of their buildings. In the case of the Parkway Improvement District, the work consisted of putting in improved roadways, parking, landscaping and lighting on both sides of Highway 69.
The annual assessment levied against the owners within the district goes up or down based on the assessed value until the debt has been paid in full, said Prescott Valley Town Manager Larry Tarkowski.
A property owner operating a nonprofit business, by town code, does not pay property taxes or pay into an improvement district. This is not fair to the other district members, Tarkowski asserts. Likewise, when a property owner moves out, other owners take on the remaining debt.
In April 2006, after property owners expressed concerns over the cost, 70 percent of owners signed on to formed the Parkway Community Facilities District 1. It called for the issuance of bonds in the amount of $3,425,000, and a separate 30 cents per $1 secondary assessed valuation Ad Valorem Property Tax for maintenance and operations purposes. The district began payments on the bonds in January 2007, and the bonds will be paid off by July 15, 2031.
In 2016-17, the Town Council approved using $50,000 from the general fund to contribute to payments ($150,000 total to date) so assessments would not be overly burdensome on the owners.
Tarkowski wants Franklin Phonetic to pay its share, and has been taking the school to court since 2016 in an effort to force the school to come up with what totals about $483,000 to date, and will become about $801,000 by 2031.
Editor's Note - This story has been updated to clarify where the Improvement District is and that Town Code states nonprofits are exempt from paying property taxes or payments into an improvement district.
More like this story
Music For Those With Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia
Depression Bipolar Support Alliance
Prescott Caregiver Support Group
Cruise In with the PAAC
Historic Downtown Walking Tours
View More Events...
This Week's Circulars
To view money-saving ads...