One of the most recognizable sports acronyms is NCAA, which stands for the National Collegiate Athletic Association. After the governing body’s recent ruling on the University of North Carolina (UNC) academic fraud case, it might as well stand for “Not Concerned with Academic Accountability.”
In 1993, UNC began offering independent study courses in the Department of African and Afro-American Studies. Over a period of almost 20 years approximately 3,100 students took the classes, almost half of whom were athletes.
The courses required no attendance and only one gradable component, a paper at the end of the semester. After the scheme was uncovered, the NCAA conducted a three – year investigation, uaue the University and/or its accrediting body should deal with. That view mirrors the longstanding NCAA position, even in cases of fake classes.
Second, UNC accurately pointed out that the paper classes were open to all students, i.e., non-athletes benefitted from them as well, which negates the NCAA’s charge of extra benefits.
The NCAA had previously determined such things as adding cream cheese to a bagel and giving an athlete a ride across campus in a golf cart constitute extra benefits.
But the Committee on Infractions couldn’t reach the same conclusion in the UNC case for the simple reason that the “paper courses” were available to the entire student body, not just athletes.
The committee ignored the fact that in addition to the phony courses, professors in the department regularly entered grade changes and administrators forged faculty signatures to help athletes remain eligible. If those activities don’t qualify as “extra benefits” then the phrase has no meaning.
The NCAA was guilty of a gross strategic error in the UNC case. Instead of levying an extra benefits charge they should have charged the University with a lack of institutional control, as they have done for much less egregious actions. It’s almost as if the governing body didn’t want to find against UNC for fear of opening Pandora’s Box when it comes to the issue of academics.
But it may have done exactly the opposite. After the UNC decision, what’s to prevent other schools from mimicking UNC? Don’t tell me it’s the shame of being exposed because the only shame in big-time college athletics is the shame of losing on the playing field.
After the NCAA ruling, the UNC athletic program can exhale. The rest of us can laugh...or throw up, depending on whether you find the NCAA’s decision and rationale humorous or disgusting. One thing is certain: No longer can we pretend that the phrase “student-athlete” has meaning.
The decision affirms there is no longer any connection between college athletics and academics. It’s time to drop the word student from the NCAA vocabulary.
Jordan Kobritzy is a former attorney, CPA, Minor League Baseball team owner and current investor in MiLB teams. He is a Professor in and Chair of the Sport Management Department at SUNY Cortland and maintains the blog: http://sportsbeyondthelines.com The opinions contained in this column are the author’s. Jordan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
More like this story
- UNC again faces NCAA extra-benefits charge in multi-year academic case
- NCAA adds charge, removes another from UNC academic case
- Kobritz Column: Colleges need to reorder their priorities
- Column: A new twist on being 'students of the game'
- Briefly: Woman asking NCAA to ban sexually violent athletes gathers 157,000 signatures