Yavapai College - Healthier lifestyle

Home | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Subscriber Services | 928 Media Lab | Real Estate Search | Galleries | Obits | Yellow Pages | TV Listings | Contact Us
The Prescott Daily Courier | Prescott, Arizona

home : latest news : latest news September 15, 2014


11/11/2012 9:56:00 PM
County's plan for monitoring bracelets hits snag

PRESCOTT - A plan to allow some offenders sentenced on DUI charges to avoid custody and wear a monitoring bracelet has hit a snag: None of the vendors interested are willing to pay for indigent defendants' equipment as the county requested.

The idea was advanced by Presiding Justice of the Peace Arthur Markham at a September Board of Supervisors meeting.

"The bracelet has a GPS device on it that says where you are on a 24-hour basis," he said. "It also has an alcohol sensor" that measures alcohol intake through perspiration "like when you blow into an Intoxilyzer."

By law, 24 days of a 30-day DUI sentence can be done as home detention. The cost to the county, if a prisoner is kept in jail, is $150 for the first day, then $70 for each day after, Markham said, explaining that a person serving home detention would save Yavapai County more than $1,600 for a 24-day sentence.

The county's request for proposals (RFPs) had those who can afford it paying their own expense, anticipated to be about $12-$15 per day, and indigent prisoners' equipment and monitoring supplied at no charge by the company selected to operate the program.

Four vendors submitted bids, but they did not include provisions for indigent prisoners.

At Monday's meeting, Supervisor Carol Springer said, "Judge Markham's philosophy is there would be no cost to the county, and that was the whole premise," but, she said, "that's not going to work as proposed."

Springer added that the board should assume that the monitoring system will include a cost to the county, and "that having people confined in their home is much less than having them confined in the county jail."

County attorney Dave Hunt wasn't willing to give up. "There a number of programs out there, and there are programs that have actually been implemented using that (no-cost) model."

Chairman Tom Thurman suggested that more research be done, new RFPs be issued, and the decision be left to the new board to be seated in January.

The board rejected the current round of bids.






    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Letter: People select, reject facts to support bias (18 comments)
Prescott Valley Event Center trial looms (15 comments)
Column: Local Muslims prefer peace, privacy (40 comments)
Column: White House doesn't care about US workers (13 comments)
NACOG helps in fight for 'living wage' (15 comments)


Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, November 16, 2012
Article comment by: Lie, lie and deny

I know! Why doesn't the BOS defer making any decision on the matter until the new BOS takes over in January? That's what they seem to be doing with every other major decision on their plates.

Management by delay....


Posted: Monday, November 12, 2012
Article comment by: Jim Looper

So what is the real reason why the Board of Supervisors would have rejected all of the RFP submissions?

Posted: Monday, November 12, 2012
Article comment by: Jim Looper

I have personal knowledge that this statement is not factual. At least one vendor did in fact submitted a proposal answer which included an indigent program.

Posted: Monday, November 12, 2012
Article comment by: Ess Tee

Don't confuse saving money with making money.This county hauls in a lot of dough from DUI offenders in jail.Get a DUI and see how many thousands of dollars you pay.

Posted: Monday, November 12, 2012
Article comment by: Tom Steele

So if it would still save the county (taxpayers)$55 per day even if the county had to pay for the devices. it would be a good deal right? So what is the problem BOS?



Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. The email and phone info you provide will not be visible to the public. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to 1300 characters or less. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit your comment entries to five(5) per day.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
HSE - Circulation Costco Memebership offer
HSE- Rants&Raves
Find more about Weather in Prescott, AZ
Click for weather forecast






Quick Links
 •  Submit site feedback or questions

 •  Submit your milestone notice

 •  Submit your letter to the editor

 •  Submit a news tip or story idea

 •  Place a classified ad online now

 •  Browse the Yellow Pages

Find It Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Links
Classifieds | Subscriber Services | Real Estate Search | Galleries | Find Prescott Jobs | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Contact Us
HSE - Cookie Contest

© Copyright 2014 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Daily Courier is the information source for Prescott area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. Prescott Newspapers Online is a service of Prescott Newspapers Inc. By using the Site, dcourier.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Prescott Newspapers Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info, Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2014 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved